{"id":8173,"date":"2017-09-20T10:33:46","date_gmt":"2017-09-20T14:33:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/?p=8173"},"modified":"2017-09-22T12:59:21","modified_gmt":"2017-09-22T16:59:21","slug":"maximizing-restorative-justice-impact","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/2017\/09\/maximizing-restorative-justice-impact\/","title":{"rendered":"Maximizing Restorative Justice Impact"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Restorative justice leaders from around the United States gather to discuss information collected in regional listening sessions.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

IN A WIDESPREAD, FAST-MOVING FIELD <\/b><\/span>such as restorative justice (RJ), how does a major grant-funding organization discern where to allot funds? One answer: engage with the Zehr Institute for Restorative Justice on a comprehensive nation-wide strategic listening process, followed by a convening of leaders in the field.<\/p>\n

From December 2016 through May 2017, listening sessions were hosted in regions across the United States: northern California, Minnesota, The Navajo Nation in New Mexico and Arizona, Baltimore\/Washington D.C.\/Virginia, and British Columbia in Canada. The sessions \u2013 led by Sonya Shah <\/b>and co-facilitators \u2013 gathered approximately 135 participants to gain a ground-level understanding of how RJ has been developed, is practiced and has evolved regionally. Shah is an RJ practitioner, professor at the California Institute of Integral Studies, and co-founder and director of the Ahimsa Collective.<\/p>\n

In April, 12 leaders from a variety of venues where RJ is practiced gathered in the Shenandoah Valley to review the findings and to collaborate on building a framework for a cohesive, impactful and long-lasting restorative justice social movement. The group also presented suggestions regarding how the funder can \u201cbest use its allotted resources to maximize the impact of its funding and capacitation efforts in support of a durable Restorative Justice movement for the future,\u201d according to a post-event summary.<\/p>\n

Framing session participants included Dr. Carl Stauffer <\/b>MA \u201902, co-director of the Zehr Institute; Shah, the lead facilitator; and several co-facilitators of the regional listening sessions:<\/p>\n

Lauren Abramson<\/b>: (co-facilitator, Maryland) founder and executive director, Community Conferencing Center, Baltimore, Maryland;<\/p>\n

Catherine Bargen <\/b>MA \u201908: (co-facilitator, British Columbia) community program manager and restorative justice coordinator, of Public Safety and Solicitor General, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;<\/p>\n

Ashlee George<\/b>: (co-facilitator, California) senior program associate, Restorative Justice Project, Impact Justice, Oakland, California;<\/p>\n

Sarah King <\/b>MA \u201917: (co-facilitator, Minnesota and project assistant) Zehr Institute for Restorative Justice, CJP;<\/p>\n

Robert Yazzie<\/b>: (co-facilitator, Navajo Nation) professor, Navajo Technical University, and retired chief justice of the Navajo Nation,Window Rock, Arizona.<\/p>\n

Other participants came from the fields of corrections, law enforcement, higher education, domestic violence, youth activism and K-12 education, media, community organizing and politics.<\/p>\n

The report is being finalized. The funding organization choses to remain anonymous.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

IN A WIDESPREAD, FAST-MOVING FIELD such as restorative justice (RJ), how does a major grant-funding organization discern where to allot funds? One answer: engage with… Read more about Maximizing Restorative Justice Impact<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8176,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1073],"tags":[],"issues":[1471],"class_list":["post-8173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-magazine","issues-2017-18"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8173"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8177,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8173\/revisions\/8177"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8176"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8173"},{"taxonomy":"issues","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emu.edu\/now\/peacebuilder\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues?post=8173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}